Free or paid, listening to your feedback might not be a priority.
I don't know if this'll make any of the changes we experience online any more palatable, but it might explain why these changes happen. I don't expect people to like what I have to say, but I believe it's a reflection of the reality to which we all must adapt. Yes, we have to adapt.
It's frustrating when services we use make changes, and even more frustrating when we make complaints or suggestions and get no response. Services often ignore the feedback of their users. We think that if the services wanted to retain their customers, they'd change in more customer-friendly ways.
Honestly, they probably do make those changes with the customer in mind; it's just not the customer you think.
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
You are Not the Customer
You are not the true customer of free services, and may also not be the target customer for many paid services. While your use of the service is needed to keep the business model viable, it often means that changes are made not with you in mind, but the advertisers or business strategies that represent the true source of revenue for the service.
The real customer of free online services
When it comes to free online services, the true "customer" -- the person or organization for whom the business is structured -- is typically either or both of two entities:
- Advertisers
- The service's parent organization or company
By and large, advertisers are the real customers here. They're the folks paying the bills by paying for the privilege of placing ads on that service's webpages. They're the ones the service is taking into account when changes are made.
I include the parent company because sometimes, a free service's real purpose is not to display ads, but rather to entice you into using other services offered by that parent company. Those other services could be services for which you do pay -- making you the customer, maybe -- or more free services.
So what are you, if not the customer?
We are the product
You and I are the product. We are what are being "sold" to the advertisers.
In crude terms, advertisers are purchasing eyeballs in the form of page views. The free service we're using is selling our attention to the advertisers who pay for that service.
Look at almost any free service -- particularly social media -- and you'll find that the "real" customer isn't you at all. We're the product the service is attracting and offering to whomever the real customer is.
It's in that "attracting" that things can get confusing.
Even if we pay for it
Even when the product is paid, the average consumer may be ignored because we're not the target customer. The product is made for someone else entirely. That we happen to use it and even pay for it is somewhat coincidental.
I fervently believe Windows falls into this category. The true customers of Windows are the businesses paying for and deploying thousands and thousands of copies across large enterprises. That's Microsoft's bread and butter, and those are the customers getting Microsoft's attention.
But it's not just Windows. Many products I use and even recommend are really targeted at small- and medium-sized businesses. That often makes them more professional and reliable, but ultimately means that our concerns as individual users aren't nearly of the same priority.
That's not to say we can be ignored
Regardless of whether we're customer or product, these services need users to make what they do work.
If we're the target customer, they're nothing without us. Depending on the business, even being a coincidental customer makes us at least somewhat important.
If, however, we're the product, then they're still nothing without us; without us, they have nothing to offer to their real customers: the advertisers.
So services still need to pay attention to what attracts us to their offering. They still need to keep enough of us happy with their service.
But that's not an absolute.
Decisions might not be made in our favor
When it comes to making changes to products, the customer comes first. If that customer is advertisers, then you can bet that sometimes those changes will come at the expense of the users of that service.
Naturally, that can't always be true, or the service would have no users, but it can explain how some decisions might not make sense to us but still be important to the success of the service overall. A successful service is all about balancing the desires of the real customers and the users.
Even when it's not about advertising -- perhaps it is a corporate direction, mandate, or funnel to other services -- the service needs to attract enough users to make business sense. But that doesn't mean they need to appeal to absolutely everyone, nor do they need to keep every existing user satisfied. As long as the business numbers work, they can do what they feel serves their goals the best.
And don't think for a minute that a free service isn't a business of some sort.1
Voting with your feet remains the best option
Complaining about a service but continuing to use it does no one any good. You remain frustrated, but the company continues to be able to offer you and your eyeballs to their real customers.
The only real impact you can have when services make changes you disagree with is to stop using the service. Only you can decide which is more of a hassle: living with the service's changes or switching.
The good news here is that there are alternatives for almost any service you find on the internet today. All it takes is a little research on your part and a willingness to take action and change.
It's nothing new
We like to think that the internet is this new world with new paradigms and new ways of dealing with things. In many ways and in many aspects, it really is.
But in this regard, it's not.
Consider this: the true customers of most print newspapers and magazines are not the subscribers -- they're the advertisers. Much like users of websites, subscribers are the "product" being delivered to the advertisers who pay the real money allowing these publications to run. Even when there's a paid subscription involved, the majority of most such publications' revenues still come from the advertising they contain.
And of course you're probably also familiar with free publications that are entirely supported by advertising.
In each case, they need subscribers' eyeballs to sell so the real customers can pay the bills.
Do this
Think about the hundreds if not thousands of services available to us for free on the internet. It's truly amazing.
Of course, they're not truly free. Advertising is the price we pay for our free services. I'm perfectly willing to let a good service benefit (and thereby continue their existence) by renting out my eyeballs.
Heck, Ask Leo! depends on advertising to pay our bills. (Though you can, of course, turn off ads on my site by becoming a Patron. 
)
I'm hopeful that while you may or may not agree with the changes you experience online, you'll have a slightly better understanding of exactly why the changes might not seem to take you, the customer, into account.
Because ultimately, you're not the customer at all.
Customer or product, you'll get more important information like this every week: subscribe to Confident Computing! Less frustration and more confidence, solutions, answers, and tips in your inbox every week.
Podcast audio
Related Video
Nailed it. Don’t liked it much. So much of how we view thing is based on fundamental misconceptions which are cleared up by rethinking. This has been a good one in that sense. BEST THING I HAVE READ THIS MONTH. [ok i know it is the 6th].
If you don’t like what Google is doing…
…good luck not using Google.
There are alternatives to Google. Many prefer Duck Duck Go. I even read an article in PC World about why Bing is better than Google;
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2685215/the-4-reasons-i-switched-from-google-to-bing.html
It all comes down to finding the product with more of the features you like. You’ll probably never find one that is perfect.
I’ve been experimenting with Bing as my search engine for a while. So far it’s better than I remember it being.
The real issue is that the search engine is just the tip of the Google iceberg. Google services are so prevalent – even the advertising on Ask Leo! is provided by Google – that for all practical purposes they’re impossible to avoid completely.
I’ve been experimenting with Bing too, not for reasons of privacy, mostly to see if a less personalized search might yield more relevant results. I seem to remember liking the old Google better. I thought that the overpersonalization might have been a major cause in the degradation in quality. I haven’t drawn any conclusions yet, although I prefer Bing’s simple layout.
Just open an incognito window (or non-chrome equivalent) and redo the search if you want to compare Google vs Google-personalised.
I have been using DuckDuckGo for months. It also works great and there is no account tied to it.
I’m actually surprised that there isn’t a organization out there — somewhere — called “GINYF” (pronounced “GUY-niff”), for “Google Is NOT Your Friend.”
If any such organization exists, I sure haven’t heard of it… nor does it seem to have accomplished very much! :/
Every day, I expect to hear of a new club called “The GINYF Society.”
“Ahem,” you ask, “GINYF?”
It stands for, “Google Is NOT Your Friend!”
So far as I am aware, no such club exists… yet.
Google isn’t your friend, but neither is it your enemy. It’s just a tool. And one of Google’s greatest contributions was to create a search war, provoking competition which is forcing search companies to do better.
I have been moderator of a few and member of several Yahoo groups. I believe that Marissa Mayer will destroy that company.
Maybe I’m wrong but the facts are I barely participate on these groups except for one that I still help moderate. However, I check messages about once a day, vs. several times a day before. For years, this group averaged 200 – 250 posts per week. Currently, it is 60.
We may not be customers, but Ms Mayer isn’t serving Yahoo, the advertisers or the product very well and it all has to do with those “changes” you talk about.
While you are 100% correct, it might be more understandable to say we, the users of the service (MSN, Google, etc.), are not the PAYING customer.
We are still the USERS and you can’t go on putting a website out for ‘advertisers’ solely. It’s pure folly. ‘Voting with your feet’, as Leo suggests, is not useful either, as it doesn’t really do anything for those who need to use it. Leaving doesn’t impart what the needs are for change…it’s basically the old girlfriend storms off and you never learn why, only to repeat it routine.
As for the comment on Yahoo, I agree about Ms. Mayer’s lack of prowess, and I would add that Y! is primarily an aggregation service that adds some original content (which they tend to get a lot of flack for) and an email provider. They started as a search engine but they’ve never really been successful as one, getting their search from Google in the early days and eventually giving up on their own engine and borrowing Bing. They allow comments on the article, many of which are somewhat acidic and anti-Yahoo, as if it’s an inside joke.
Maybe their advertisers like that. When they changed the Yahoogroups, however, they basically killed off a lot of formerly vibrant groups (there are supposed to be over 100,000!) which had struggled to survive after a few notorious attacks on their email system (which was a primary feed source and still is a useful tool) had to be shut down for long periods of time.
It only goes to show that ‘free email’ is not only a hugely important feature, it is a sore spot that can disrupt and degrade the user experience dramatically across the entire site. Building features like lifestyle articles, music and shopping around it is nice, but in the end it’s still email, even with cellphones and instant messaging.
Which means we’re not the customer.
Then we must be refugees, dissidents or…?
Captain Yossarian we are not.
Yes. you are right. Money talks, and as a user of a free service, you don’t have a very large voice. Change is inevitable and constant. Roll with it or stop whining. There is always another way.
My $.02 CDN
Great article and becoming more and more true in all forms of broadcasting be it internet or any form of media marketed at the public.
Well said, almost 10 years later. We are the product. I believe there is a more insidious aspect, however, and that has to do with data harvesting. Browsing habits recorded because of an internet beacon, cookie here, cookie there… Give us your phone number here so we have an alternate way to contact you. What do you mean, my email is not enough? It’s all designed to correlate you to where you surf, what you buy. It will be collated, aggregated, refined… All to be sure you are the best target for advertising. Net neutrality, what happened…..
Net neutrality affected the bottom line of large Internet providers who give priority to bigger websites that they can profit from. Ending Net Neutrality is the result of legalized bribery.
Just remember that we are customers of the companies that are Free Internet providers’ customers. The easy fix is find the Free Internet providers’ customer and take action against them if they don’t support the Free Internet providers in the way that suites us then we boycott their products.