Download the mp3 [10M]
This is Leo Notenboom with news, commentary, and answers to some of the many questions I get at askleo.com.
A couple of frequent questions I get here at ask-leo are “What Anti-Spyware program should I use?” and “What’s the best Anti-Virus program?”
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
Now, while I use and recommend Microsoft’s Anti-Spyware, and have used Computer Associate’s eTrust anti-virus software for many years Microsoft Security Essentials, I have to remind people that there’s no perfect example of either. All of the anti-spyware programs miss things that some of the others might catch. Same for the anti-virus programs. That’s why my real recommendation is typically to run one of the better ones, but have a couple of others in reserve, just in case.
But make sure you run *something* for both spyware and viruses and keep the databases for each as up to date as possible.
I was reminded of this the other day when I stumbled onto a posting on Larry Osterman’s weblog. Larry’s a long time Microsoft developer who started there a year after I did. He recently posted about how someone else had made the claim that a properly designed operating system shouldn’t need any anti-virus or anti-spyware software. Larry pointed out the more practical reality of the situation in what has been termed the “dancing bunnies” problem.
It works like this: if typical users receive an email that says, “Click here to see dancing bunnies,” then a significant number of them are going to circumvent any protections the system might have in place, because they want to see the dancing bunnies, dammit.
That’s the heart of what’s been called social engineering – promise something you know people will react to to get them to allow whatever else you really had in mind.
At that point, it doesn’t matter what the ideal operating system is or even the best anti-spyware or anti-virus software is. Users need to be protected by *something* that makes sure that what the user just clicked on, or ran, or even installed is “safe” by someone’s definition.
You could claim that users should be educated so that they don’t need to be protected from themselves. Theoretically, you might be right.
But practically? Well, we all like to see dancing bunnies sometimes.
Have a comment? Visit ask leo dot info, and enter 8873 in the go to article number box please leave it below. Let me know what you think, I’d love to hear from you. I’ve got links to Larry Osterman’s “Beware of the dancing bunnies”
Post, as well as my anti-spyware and anti-virus recommendations.