I started with posing to you a simple question:
My goal was to find out today’s burning issues, and with that information fine tune where I spend my time and energy.
You did not disappoint. I was overwhelmed with the number of responses, for which I am truly grateful. Of course that contributed just a little to it taking longer than I’d expected to process the results.
I want to share with you what I’ve learned, some of the tweaking that has already happened as a result, as well as some thoughts for the future.
Change, in a landside
As I processed the thousands (yep, thousands) of responses to the initial survey I started by trying to identify common themes. If you’ve seen the follow-on survey you’ll know that the top four “buckets” I identified were:
- Change – Coping with constantly changing technologies and software.
- Security – Staying safe; individually online, as well as keeping your computing devices safe from malicious threats.
- Documentation & Terminology – Instructions that can’t be understood, unfamiliar terms, lack of “how to” information.
- Maintenance & Stability – Bugs, failures, and things that just plain don’t work, as well as the efforts required to keep thing working as smoothly as possible.
There were many others, of course (those haven’t been ignored, and they do factor in), but these are the top four areas that I saw people identifying as their greatest challenges.
But without a doubt more people expressed issues or even flat-out anger with some aspect of technology-related change than with any other topic that came up in the survey.
The second survey was simply a request to dig a little deeper. Then things got interesting.
Change, second runner up
Change dropped from first to third place in the second survey.
The reason, I believe, is pretty simple. In the second survey I indicated that we can’t stop change, not in any practical sense at least, so I asked how Ask Leo! might be able to help.
What most of the responses in the first survey really expressed was the desire for change to stop, slow down, or at least not be forced upon us. While I totally understand that frustration, I’m sorry to say that it’s not in our control. As a practical matter change will continue, probably at near to its current pace. And yes, some of the changes may well be mandatory.
Opinions on change clustered into the following areas:
- The practical and time consuming cost of having to re-learn something that was previously understood.
- Functionality that disappears after an upgrade.
- “Change for the sake of change” was a common phrase.
- Forced upgrades.
- Cost, stress, a perception of decreased security
Suggestions on how Ask Leo! could help were few as most of the opinions continued to share frustration. However there are absolutely a few take-aways for me.
Articles that help describe “new ways” of doing things, and that locate lost functionality (or confirm that it’s really gone) are two ideas that come to mind right away. Naturally I have opinions on the “change for the sake of change” issue, and perhaps can share some ideas to make the inevitable a little less stressful.
To be honest, I expected security to come up higher on the first survey, but it and maintenance, below, pretty much tied for first place on the second.
There’s a lot of fear and uncertainty around just knowing whether or not you’re adequately protected. Security software, and malware itself, is essentially so much magic to most people that it’s nearly impossible for the casual computer user to have a practical sense of just how secure – or vulnerabe – they are.
A surprising request was to (and I’m paraphrasing) define what “common sense” means. By that I mean: people such as myself often throw out a few guidelines to staying secure, but then cap it off by saying “and of course use common sense”. There’s an assumption in that statement that there’s a common definition or a common understanding of just what “common sense” means. Even to those that do have a basic understanding, they’re so often helping others that a more explicit reference or resource would be helpful.
Additional concerns ran the gamut from issues with specific software or scenarios to security in “the cloud” and email scams, as well as specific concerns regarding security when handling now ubiquitous (and sometimes required) online banking and finance.
Maintenance & Stability
This was an interesting area of concern, and much of it focused on exactly one issue: updates.
Specifically updates that change, break or hide things that were previously working. Or updates that, themselves, simply fail to work. Even without updates being identified as the cause, the phrase “things just stop working”, without any obvious cause, was a common theme.
The difficulty of troubleshooting problems when they occur was another theme. Understanding what’s broken, sometimes from only an extremely obscure and unhelpful error message – or no error message at all – was cited as a common frustration. Having any hope of a clue for what to do next to resolve the issue naturally followed.
Other issues that came up often included networking (or, as some might call it “not”working), drivers, backing up, and an overall sense that the systems we’re using are simply fragile.
Documentation & Terminology
While fourth in terms of number of responses, the issues here were no less significant.
The number one issue that people reported struggling with here is simply the assumption of knowledge. What documentation and help you do find simply assume that you know more than you actually do. When that happens, the documentation that might be present is next to useless in helping you resolve your problems or learn whatever it is you’re attempting to learn.
The overall quality of documentation was also a common complaint. Documentation that looked like it was written by a less-than-fluent English speaker, for example, often contributed to increasing confusion.
Additional issues included a desire for actual paper manuals, more step-by-step and task-oriented instructions, as well as more detailed reference material.
Also mentioned in this category were issues with support – including both live support personnel as well as the quality (or lack thereof) of on-line knowledge bases.
And of course wrapped up in understanding and using the right terminology is the fact that without it it becomes extremely difficult to even find the answers that you’re looking for.
What it all means for Ask Leo!
Some of my more recent changes are, in fact, a result of what I was seeing as I was processing the survey results.
The most important is a re-focus on more detailed, more step-by-step how-to articles and explanations. You’ll see more screen shots and more video.
The glossary has returned to the weekly newsletter. I want to demystify the terms that confuse, and work to make what I and others in my position say more understandable. Unfortunately it sometimes does take specific and technical terms to properly describe some things – but that doesn’t mean we can’t adequately define them first.
As a result of your responses, I know what my next book will be. The fears about security in general were greater than I expected, so I will prioritize a significant update of my Internet Safety book.
Above all, though, I’ll do my best to continue to present information in a way that’s as easy to understand as possible, while still being as accurate and helpful as possible.
Your questions drive the whole thing
I’ve said honestly and repeatedly that I can’t answer every question. Heck, just look at all the issues above and you’ll see that it’s impossible for one man to address it all.
That’s where you come in.
Your questions set my priorities. My goal is to help as many people as possible, and that means I prioritize the questions I tackle based in part on how many people are asking about a given issue. Priority is also given to those questions that come with enough information to actually answer – that helps me not only answer the specific question, but it helps me see how similar it is to other questions.
So, even if you get no response when asking a question, please understand that I do read them, and you’re helping set the tone of Ask Leo!.
And absolutely do subscribe to the newsletter, or follow Ask Leo! on Facebook, grab the site RSS feed, or use whatever technique works for you to keep an eye on the answers that I publish. A explained above, if I don’t reply to you directly, there’s always a chance that the question you asked will be one similar to that asked by many others and thus get addressed.
Thank you very much for participating in the survey, but more than that thank you for being here, thank you for supporting Ask Leo!, and thank you for your kind words. Many of the responses to the survey reminded me why I do what I do, and for that I am grateful.