I’m having a problem with Outlook 2003. When I send an HTML email through
Outlook 2003 the email looks great, but when it is received it looks like
someone blew it up. All of my layers are either missing or moved. Almost every
piece of formatting put into the email is removed. I send one copy of the email
to myself and it appeared as good as it was when I sent it.
HTML formatted email can be pretty cool. You can make exceptionally
beautiful email, almost works of art even.
And then when you send it there’s a very good chance that all that work
might simply disappear, and at worst be completely and totally unintelligible
to your recipient.
HTML is a standard.
HTML as rendered in different email programs? Not so standard.
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
The problem is, at its root, very simple: HTML was developed for web pages,
and email is not a web page. I’ll also put it another way: email programs are
not web browsers. Now, that’s certainly oversimplifying things, but the
problems we see with HTML formatted email all pretty much trace back to
HTML is incredibly powerful. And while not strictly HTML, things
embeddable objects, AJAX and a bunch of other technologies have taken the web
to a whole new and incredibly powerful level.
The question boils down to this: how much HTML must an email program
The simple stuff is obvious: formatting like bold and italics, paragraph
delineation and the like are useful and, above all, safe concepts.
How about layout things like tables? Or more complex layout options like
floating objects, font size changes and the like? The problem here is that not
only are these items more difficult for email programs to display, they’re also
all being abused by spammers. Tables are being used to circumvent simple
“banned words” detection; spammers use tiny fonts to overload the email with
random text to make it “look like” it isn’t spam; floating objects are often
used to hide things, or make it look like you’re about to click on one thing
when you’re in fact being taken somewhere else entirely.
HTML is powerful, but with that comes the ability to really mess things
So different email programs have opted to support different levels of HTML.
Some will support almost all HTML constructs. Some will support only the bare
bones simple formatting constructs.
And others don’t know what to do with HTML at all, and end up displaying the
HTML in it’s raw format.
Given the mix of what might be supported and what might not be supported,
then add in image blocking which is often turned on by default, it’s simply
unrealistic to assume you can control the exact appearance of what
your recipient sees in email. You can control a few things, and of course you
can control the text (which is the point of your email anyway, right?), but if
you really want exact, pixel-by-pixel layout or super fancy formatting, then
email simply isn’t the medium for that message.
So what steps should you take?
Don’t use Microsoft Word as your email editor. On top of
everything else, Word uses proprietary HTML that will only work if your
recipient is also using Word to view their email. Use Outlook’s internal HTML
editor, or something else entirely.
Don’t use most WYSIWYG HTML editors to compose email.
Unless you’re hand-editing the HTML itself, they often create complex and
Don’t go overboard with formatting. The simpler you can
keep it, the greater the chances that your recipients will actually be able to
And if you’re into HTML directly, use tables, not CSS
positioning, don’t even think about using stylesheets, and use in-place
attributes rather than any kind of in-line style definitions. And that’s just a
And be prepared for the HTML to be stripped out entirely. Make sure that
your message still makes sense should all the formatting and images disappear