I enjoy experimenting with computers: installing and running different
software. Occasionally, I crash Windows and there’s no way back except to
reinstall the entire operating system. Right now, I know of only one way to
remedy a completely crashed Windows; by having a separate hard disk where the
entire computer image is saved. After an unrecoverable crash, I exchange the
hard disks and make another copy. For an image, I use Acronis TrueImage. I use
two operating systems on two separate computers: Win 7 and Vista.
Here’s my question: let’s say that I have 20 programs installed on Windows,
Win 7 or Vista, and everything runs well. Now, after I install program 21, and
play with it for a while, the computer really slows down. While trying to make
things better, the computer is getting slower and slower. My question is whether
just making a complete copy of the registry, by exporting it while there are
only 20 programs installed, and substituting or importing after the registry
went through the installation and changes with program 21 would in effect
return the Windows OS to its pre-installation of program 21 instead of using
the old image?
In this excerpt from
Answercast #34, I look at the idea of keeping a copy of a computer’s
registry as a backup and restore option. It probably won’t work all that
Restoring a backup registry
There’s two answers to that.
The quick answer is no. And there’s a couple of reasons for that.
The other answer is: that’s kind-of sort-of what System Restore does.
It’s one of the reasons that I don’t like System Restore; it really doesn’t work as well as we would like or as reliably as we would like it to.
System Restore is trying to do exactly what you describe. Sometimes, it works: so that might be something to consider doing, but still be prepared for it to fail.
Now, the problem with just exporting the registry and restoring the registry is that when you install a program (program 21, in your case), quite often that program will make more changes than just what’s in the registry.
For example, it may replace a common system file:
If that common system file is the source of the slow downs that you’re seeing, simply restoring the registry isn’t going to undo that from having been done.
- The registry is a database of information; it’s not going to actually affect the files that are installed on the machine.
That’s not common, but it does happen.
Uninstalling software is different
The fact is that uninstalling software does something valuable. In many cases, it will revert software that’s been overwritten by the install to its previous version if that software is shared with other programs on your system.
So the short answer is no, I would not do this.
Restore instead of swap
I’m not sure why you’re swapping hard disks. The approach that I would take to do this (if you’re doing this on such a regular basis) is actually very simple:
I would certainly use an external hard disk or a second hard disk to store my backup image.
I would use something like Acronis or Macrium or any of a number of disk imaging utilities.
Given that image then, if you decide you need to revert, I wouldn’t swap around anything:
I would simply boot from the rescue media that’s associated with your backup software;
And restore the image to your hard drive with no swapping of drives involved at all.
That to me seems less disruptive. It might, I suppose, take a little bit more time because it’s going to be streaming an image of your hard disk back to your hard disk. In your case, you’re simply swapping hard drives and maybe you’ve gotten really good at that by now.
The short answer to me is nope, don’t use the registry. It’s just not going to be reliable for the kinds of things you want to recover from.
Consider using the backup programs in the manner that they were actually designed to be used, rather than swapping hard disks just restore the backed up image.
Next from Answercast 34 – Should I report this malware that I just encountered, and to whom?