Which takes more disk space, back-up, or copying files? To date I have only
copied files (.doc, .jpg, etc.) but probably need to do a back-up. How much
space is required in relation to the amount of space already in use on my hard
Naturally, it depends on how much you’re backing up, how you’re doing it,
and what tools you’re using to do it. It even depends on what kind of data
you’re backing up.
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
Copying files takes up exactly as much space as the files you’re copying,
You can often reduce the size of your copied files somewhat by compressing
the results. For example instead of copying a set of files, you might create a
zip’ed archive of those files and save that in a safe backup location. It’ll
normally be smaller than the sum of the files that went into it. How much
smaller? Well, as we’ll see in a moment, that depends.
As you can probably guess, I’m a big believer in performing full backups of
some sort. That way you know that everything – whether you thought you
might need it or not – is backed up. With the right tools, recovery from a
catastrophic failure is a simple restore from that full backup. Everything,
Windows, your applications, your settings, and your data can all restored from
your most recent full backup.
How much space will that full backup take?
Well, “worst case” is that backup will take exactly as much space as your
original files take up. In other words, a full backup is just a special kind of
“copy” of all of your original files. Instead of copying just a few files as
you’re doing now, everything is copied. (It’s a special case, and requires some
kind of special tool or technique, because certain files which cannot normally
be copied while they’re in use must also be copied.)
The good news is that most backup programs actually also compress your data
as you backup. A good example is my own machine – as I write this my C: drive
contains roughly 62 gigabytes of data, but the last full backup of the drive is
only 50 gigabytes due primarily to compression.
software and a large external hard drive …”
But of course that’s not the whole story.
A periodic full backup is often only part of a complete backup strategy. In
my case, in addition to that 50 gigabyte full backup image, there’s an another
120 gigabytes of daily incremental backups.
As a result, how much space your backup is going to take will depend in part
on exactly what backup strategy you elect to take. A once a month a full backup
that gets overwritten each month is going to take up less space but provide
fewer recovery options than the same plus a daily incremental backup. It all
depends on what you need.
Finally, a word about compression.
In short: compressing data that is already compressed will not save
much, if any, space.
For example: if you’re backing up your collection of MP3 files, those are
already compressed. MP3 is a compressed format, and attempting to compress it
again, even as part of a backup, will not make MP3 files much smaller. The same
is true for any compressed file format, which includes almost all images, music
and video files. If you have lots of those, then expect the backup to be closer
to the same size as the original files themselves.
On the other hand, if you’re backing up primarily documents, programs and
the like, you may see much better compression.
Ultimately my recommendation is simple: invest in good backup software and a
large external hard drive (USB or Firewire) that has the capacity to do full
backups, perhaps with periodic incrementals, to meet your needs. For example
my primary “C:” drive is 70 gigabytes, but my backup drive is 250gig – more
than enough to handle the backup strategy I’ve settled on. In the long run, it
really is worth it.