Technology in terms you understand. Sign up for the Confident Computing newsletter for weekly solutions to make your life easier. Click here and get The Ask Leo! Guide to Staying Safe on the Internet — FREE Edition as my thank you for subscribing!

What's your take on the online spying bill CISPA?


I’m wondering what you think of CISPA, an online spying bill for the internet
where the private sector can send your private data to the government or to
other businesses: everything from your email, texts, and so on. And do you think
it will work?

In this excerpt from
Answercast #18
, I look at a bill being proposed in the United States and give sources for finding up-to-date information.


What will CISPA do?

Do I think it will work? It depends on what you mean by “work.”

If the thing passes, then obviously it will work for all those businesses and companies and the government who want access to all of that information. I’m not totally convinced of the benefit; and I’m very scared by the potential cost in the intrusion into our lives and privacy.

Informed opinion requires research

I certainly have not researched the bill sufficiently to offer you what I would consider to be a qualified opinion.

That being said, several organizations that I do respect have taken some strong positions against these kinds of cyber spying bills as they’ve come along. CIPA (Children’s Internet Protection Act) being the one that came up last year.

Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act

CISPA stands for the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (even though, it’s 2012 now.)

It is something that I think we, as internet users, need to become aware of and make sure that our opinions here in the United States are shared with our government representatives. Typically, that means the House of Representatives, or the Senate, or both; as in fact, for such a bill to become law, I believe both have to act on it.

My understanding is that the President has promised to veto it because he didn’t like it. As with all political promises, it’s one of those things that’s probably changeable depending on various things (depending on your level of cynicism.)

Research sources

What I want to do is point you to three articles on CISPA that I think would be worth your spending a little time researching.

I’m going to give short links off my own redirectors because in many cases, the URLs for these pages are actually quite lengthy.

(Note: is my redirector; it’s my equivalent of tinyurl or or those kinds of things. “CISPA” is the token for this one. It will get you to the U.S. House of Representatives page on the Cyber Intelligence Sharing Protection Act bill.)

Most of the information you’ll find there is supportive of the bill because it’s been written and provided by the sponsors of the bill.

This is an article out at entitled, “How CISPA would affect you.” It’s an FAQ basically. It’s in a question and answer format covering much of what CISPA does and does not do.

This is an article from PC World and it is entitled CISPA: Four viewpoints you should hear.

The importance of this one is that it also includes the EFF’s position. The EFF is the Electronic Frontier Foundation. They’re a non-profit organization dedicated to keeping an eye on what organizations and government are doing with respect to the internet: freedoms on the internet, privacy, security, and so forth.

The article actually has both pro and con viewpoints on CISPA, so it’s a great starting point; a good jumping off point for being able to form your own opinion, pro or con, on what this legislation would entail.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

And lastly, I’ll just throw in plug for the EFF in general,

They are an organization that I personally support. By support, I mean I make some donations to them periodically.

The interesting thing about the internet is that it is in many ways still all being discovered. We’re still all ‘kinda making this up’ as we go along. That includes laws and court cases and decisions that typically may seem like they’re only about one particular issue or a specific event; but in fact they end up setting precedence for larger issues like: your online privacy, your online access to open information and so forth.

So they’re an organization that I support. If continuing to keep an open internet is of interest to you, I might suggest you at least check them out as well.

Make your own decision on CISPA

So, like I said, I’m not going to give you a strong “yea” or “nay”. My gut feeling says this CISPA is evil; it’s mostly based on hearsay from some of the other organizations that I’ve just listed. I strongly recommend that you go out and have a look at the information that’s out there on CISPA and then make your opinions known to your appropriate representative in government.

I realize that this is mostly for my listeners in the United States. That’s where this bill is happening, but there are certainly similar issues planet-wide, worldwide, and I think that it’s something we all want to be paying attention to; and keeping an eye on.

Do this

Subscribe to Confident Computing! Less frustration and more confidence, solutions, answers, and tips in your inbox every week.

I'll see you there!

4 comments on “What's your take on the online spying bill CISPA?”

  1. I personally believe that any broadcast information, whether by internet ( email or web browsing ) or radio ( including mobile calls), should be treated as in the public domain, so there is no privacy issue here. If you want to keep something private then do not broadcast it!

    The big problem is cost – how much taxpayers’ money is going to be spent on this? That is the issue. If such a bill is passed there should be a maximum annual cap on the amount included.

  2. I guess Eric envisions the US as a police state wherein privacy has no place in society, even during phone calls. Interesting that his only concern is the potential monetary cost. I sure am glad Eric’s not in charge of anything.

  3. Eric, it’s annoying when people make your comment. Apparently you do not do any sort of banking online. Also assume you don’t make telephone calls (I’m not talking VOIP), because a majority of them are routed through internet lines by the phone companies at some point to their destination. Also assume you don’t shop in stores, have a bank account, or basically leave your house because every third party you interact with in the real world keeps online data of you. According to you this is free game for all of us to use in the public domain.

  4. Broadcasts have never been public domain is regards to being rebroadcast. If they had been, they would have been mostly created by amateurs who had no interest in recouping their investment. Intellectual property protection has allowed America and many other countries to get investors to invest in building and developing very high levels of cultural productivity that employs millions. There has never been a right to privacy regarding enabling people to illegally duplicate and rebroadcast intellectual property without permission. The people that advocate for this like the EFF and Public Knowledge are funded by the search engines, ISPs and internet ad networks that profit from eliminating intellectual property protections.

    To be clear, the EFF does not promote, condone or support illegal piracy. What the do support is protection against governments and corporations using copyright and cyber-terrorism as excuses to over-reach and curtail basic rights and policies such as fair-use, privacy and more. It’s probably obvious that while I may not agree with every single action they’ve ever taken I do support the EFF and beleive that what they do is important in safeguarding individual rights.
    By the nature of what I do (online publishing) I’m a strong believer in copyright and intellectual property rights, but that’s not at all incompatible with individual rights as well.


Leave a reply:

Before commenting please:

  • Read the article.
  • Comment on the article.
  • No personal information.
  • No spam.

Comments violating those rules will be removed. Comments that don't add value will be removed, including off-topic or content-free comments, or comments that look even a little bit like spam. All comments containing links and certain keywords will be moderated before publication.

I want comments to be valuable for everyone, including those who come later and take the time to read.