I’m wondering what you think of CISPA, an online spying bill for the internet
where the private sector can send your private data to the government or to
other businesses: everything from your email, texts, and so on. And do you think
it will work?
In this excerpt from
Answercast #18, I look at a bill being proposed in the United States and give sources for finding up-to-date information.
]]>
<
I personally believe that any broadcast information, whether by internet ( email or web browsing ) or radio ( including mobile calls), should be treated as in the public domain, so there is no privacy issue here. If you want to keep something private then do not broadcast it!
The big problem is cost – how much taxpayers’ money is going to be spent on this? That is the issue. If such a bill is passed there should be a maximum annual cap on the amount included.
I guess Eric envisions the US as a police state wherein privacy has no place in society, even during phone calls. Interesting that his only concern is the potential monetary cost. I sure am glad Eric’s not in charge of anything.
Eric, it’s annoying when people make your comment. Apparently you do not do any sort of banking online. Also assume you don’t make telephone calls (I’m not talking VOIP), because a majority of them are routed through internet lines by the phone companies at some point to their destination. Also assume you don’t shop in stores, have a bank account, or basically leave your house because every third party you interact with in the real world keeps online data of you. According to you this is free game for all of us to use in the public domain.
Broadcasts have never been public domain is regards to being rebroadcast. If they had been, they would have been mostly created by amateurs who had no interest in recouping their investment. Intellectual property protection has allowed America and many other countries to get investors to invest in building and developing very high levels of cultural productivity that employs millions. There has never been a right to privacy regarding enabling people to illegally duplicate and rebroadcast intellectual property without permission. The people that advocate for this like the EFF and Public Knowledge are funded by the search engines, ISPs and internet ad networks that profit from eliminating intellectual property protections.
By the nature of what I do (online publishing) I’m a strong believer in copyright and intellectual property rights, but that’s not at all incompatible with individual rights as well.
22-May-2012