Technology in terms you understand. Sign up for the Confident Computing newsletter for weekly solutions to make your life easier. Click here and get The Ask Leo! Guide to Staying Safe on the Internet — FREE Edition as my thank you for subscribing!

Let’s Chat About Microsoft

A story of lost opportunity when it comes to consumers

I reflect on Microsoft, and some of their many disappointing decisions that would indicate average consumers aren't really on their radar.

Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!

TL;DR:

Chatting about Microsoft

I worked at Microsoft for over 18 years; it was exciting but far from perfect. Nowadays, Microsoft prioritizes corporate interests over everyday users, making frustrating product decisions. I’d love better alternatives, but Linux, Mac, or Chromebooks may not suit everyone. I’ll keep helping Windows users practically, despite my concerns.

Transcript

Show Transcript

Do this

Subscribe to Confident Computing! Less frustration and more confidence, solutions, answers, and tips in your inbox every week.

I'll see you there!

Footnotes & References

5 comments on “Let’s Chat About Microsoft”

  1. I can understand Microsoft placing their emphasis on corporate users, but there’s no excuse for how they treat their non-corporate customers. We may not be their main source of income but there are approximately 1.6 billion devices running Windows. There are over a billion non-corporate users. At $35 a license, that’s over 35 billon dollars. They sell about a quarter of billion licenses a year. At that rate, they earn a little under 9 billion dollars a year just on consumers. That’s in addition to the ad revenue they get by forcing Bing and Copilot on people.

    I believe the real reason for the neglect is that they have a captive audience who feel they have no other option. The average user has no real alternative. Facebook is in a similar situation and does little to correct major bugs. Most people have no clue how to download and create a Linux installation disc. And even if they had clear instructions, most would be afraid to attempt it. The only real Linux alternative for the masses is a Chromebook. Essentially, not learning curve. I bought one for my 72 year old brother and he barely notices the difference from Window. He’s been using it for 1 1/2 years.

    Outlook (new) is a prime example. First of all, it’s not a new Outlook. It’s a crippled email client. Outlook Express was a good and popular program. I don’t see any reason why Microsoft couldn’t create a new email program with most of the functionality of OE. Microsoft is saving money, but what’s a few million dollars on a product that earns them billions? Or is it just stupidity?

    Here’s an experiment: commit yourself to doing everything you do using only the Google Chrome browser. If you can still do everything you need with Chrome, you might consider getting a Chromebook or Chromebox next time around. It’s cheaper than a Windows computer. The experience will be a little different, but it should be close enough to know whether a Chromebook is for you.

    Reply
  2. If I weren’t working with Ask Leo!, I’d be using Linux as my main operating system. I already have 3 Linux machines. The only thing holding the average user from using Linux is the learning curve. When Vista and later Windows 7 came out, the learning curve for Linux Mint was no greater than learning Vista or Windows 7. Many people hated Vista because they had to learn a new user interface. I found Linux Mint more similar to XP than Vista was.

    Reply
  3. Has anyone noticed that when downloading and installing Microsoft 365, Outlook is not included?
    After a clean install of Windows 11, I noticed that I couldn’t find a way to switch to Outlook (Classic) after reinstalling Microsoft 365, only the new Outlook showed up. After uninstalling Microsoft 365, uninstalling the new Outlook (which was installed as part of the Windows installation), then downloading and installing Microsoft 365 I discovered that Outlook wasn’t part of the installation. I would have had to go to the Microsoft Store in install it.
    What really floored me is that I found a way to install Outlook (Classic) on a Microsoft Support page as a standalone installation. I bookmarked the page for future reference.
    I’m setting up Thunderbird just in case.

    Reply
  4. I suppose I’m not the usual Windows user, because way back in the late 1990’s I installed my first GNU/Linux distribution (Mandrake Linux), and I’ve been a GNU/Linux user off-and-on (mostly on) ever since. Today, I dual-boot Windows 11 with Garuda GNU/Linux (the KDE-Lite flavor) on my desktop, and primary laptop computers, and I dual-boot Windows 10 with Garuda GNU/Linux (the KDE-Lite flavor) on my older Dell Inspiron 5555 laptop. Garuda is based on Arch Linux, so it probably isn’t for the GNU/Linux newbie, but it lets me make it everything I want it to be, something I can’t easily accomplish on other distributions, or on any version of Windows.

    Enough about me, I agree that Microsoft has made many very foolish decisions about their offerings for the home user. Enterprise customers may want systems featuring a generalized feature-set, as well as systems that simply work. Many home users may want that same simplified set-up too, but some of us may also want to be able to dig deeper, and make Windows something unique and customized to our specific tastes. Additionally, M$ seems to think they know what’s best for everyone, so they force a lot of “features” on all of us, but they don’t provide easily accessible/navigable/comprehensible documentation telling us how to modify/remove those features we don’t want. While Microsoft may own Windows, they don’t own my computers, and I should have the right/ability to make the user interface work/look the way I want it to. Microsoft doesn’t own me, and they should remember that.

    My2Cents,

    Ernie

    Reply

Leave a reply:

Before commenting please:

  • Read the article.
  • Comment on the article.
  • No personal information.
  • No spam.

Comments violating those rules will be removed. Comments that don't add value will be removed, including off-topic or content-free comments, or comments that look even a little bit like spam. All comments containing links and certain keywords will be moderated before publication.

I want comments to be valuable for everyone, including those who come later and take the time to read.