Technology in terms you understand. Sign up for the Confident Computing newsletter for weekly solutions to make your life easier. Click here and get The Ask Leo! Guide to Staying Safe on the Internet — FREE Edition as my thank you for subscribing!

Is there any real difference between copying files using copy/paste versus copy-to-folder?

Question:

Is there any real difference between a “copy and paste” method versus the
old tried and true method of using the Edit menu, select all the files you want
to copy to another location and then select the “copy to a folder” command
which brings up the standard browse dialog box in which you navigate to the
destination and then click “copy”. I would imagine that both methods copy
exactly the same number of bytes, every 0 and every 1. It’s just a matter of
personal preference.

In this excerpt from
Answercast #93
I look at various ways of copying and moving files around in
Windows. How you do it is basically a matter of personal preference.

]]>

Copy/paste vs. copy-to-folder

You imagine correctly. And in fact, neither is tried or true. You will find that many people are only aware of the copy/paste method and have no inkling that the other method even exists.

And those are only two of what turns out to be several methods:

  • You can drag and drop;

  • You can use copy and paste, of course;

  • You can go to a command prompt and use copy commands at the command line.

Copying is copying

There are many, many different ways to copy and move files around in Windows. They are ultimately, at the end of the day, all doing exactly the same thing. They’re copying a bunch of bits from one location to another. And they all fundamentally do it the same way once the process is initiated.

What it boils down to is, as you’ve correctly identified, personal preference. Whatever you are comfortable with; whichever model of understanding how copying files works works for you.

So there’s no difference. Use whichever one you feel most comfortable with and don’t be surprised if you find somebody else is more comfortable with something else.

(Transcript lightly edited for readability.)

Do this

Subscribe to Confident Computing! Less frustration and more confidence, solutions, answers, and tips in your inbox every week.

I'll see you there!

7 comments on “Is there any real difference between copying files using copy/paste versus copy-to-folder?”

  1. I add ‘copy to folder’ and ‘move to folder’ to the context menu. I find it a good time saver. I’d mention where I got the registry adds, but I’m not sure whether I’d be violating the terms of this forum.

    Reply
  2. Before Windows 7 and 8, I have found that using the “copy to folder” method will keep the folders’/files’ original creation/modified dates, while using “copy/paste” would have everything default to the day of the action. Again, not sure if this still applies today…

    Reply
  3. For large copies I use the command line XCOPY – typically in a script. This provides a lot of control over verification, restart, continue on error, etc.

    Typing XCOPY /? at a command prompt shows the various control switches available.

    Reply
  4. There are instances where the right-click drop-down menu does not work and Copy does not function. Some times (not always) one can use the control-C command to copy.

    Reply
  5. Since Windows 7, I always open the two folders, snap one to the left, the other to the right, and drag the files to copy from one folder to the other.

    There are some instances where this action might result in a Move rather than Copy, in which case I hold down Ctrl while dragging to copy instead.

    Reply
  6. You can also drag and drop using the right mouse button. This pops up a context menu that gives copy, move, and create shortcut options.

    Reply
  7. For users of Windows program Xplorer2 (by Zabkat) copying is especially easy and reliable. Its interface has two panes, each with a view of the file structure. With F5 one copies files (and folders) to the opposite pane, with F6 one moves them. Copying/moving between separate disks is done in “robust” mode, including verifying the results. Xplorer2 has a free Light version, which misses a few features that the paid Pro version offers. The program has many great other features. (I hold no stock in Zabkat.)

    Reply

Leave a reply:

Before commenting please:

  • Read the article.
  • Comment on the article.
  • No personal information.
  • No spam.

Comments violating those rules will be removed. Comments that don't add value will be removed, including off-topic or content-free comments, or comments that look even a little bit like spam. All comments containing links and certain keywords will be moderated before publication.

I want comments to be valuable for everyone, including those who come later and take the time to read.