Technology in terms you understand. Sign up for the Confident Computing newsletter for weekly solutions to make your life easier. Click here and get The Ask Leo! Guide to Staying Safe on the Internet — FREE Edition as my thank you for subscribing!

Can you recommend an anti-virus tool that will work in a 256MB system?


I have a 256 MB of RAM system. Whatever anti-virus I install, the system is
terribly slowed down. Can you suggest an anti-virus that is compatible with 256
MB of RAM? I’ve tried almost all the anti-virus softwares, the latest being
Avira but even that slows down my computer a lot. Can you help?

In this excerpt from
Answercast #62
, I look at an old machine struggling to run current

Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!

Anti-virus in an underpowered machine

Probably not, unfortunately. 256 MB used to be a pretty big system – not
anymore. I don’t know what version of Windows you’re running, but even Windows
XP will struggle (without any anti-virus software!) on that kind of a

Need more RAM

So about the only thing that I can recommend (and recommend strongly) is that you
increase the amount of RAM in that machine if it’s at all possible.

If it is not, then I really don’t have any good alternatives for you short
of finding a new machine. The fact is 256 MB is not sufficient to run any of
the current operating systems. It just isn’t and that means that you’re in a
hard place.

If you can’t upgrade the RAM, you may need to consider upgrading the

Do this

Subscribe to Confident Computing! Less frustration and more confidence, solutions, answers, and tips in your inbox every week.

I'll see you there!

5 comments on “Can you recommend an anti-virus tool that will work in a 256MB system?”

  1. If upgrading the RAM or buying a new computer is not an option and you are still worried about staying secure, I would install Lubuntu linux to that machine and get on with browsing safely. It uses low resources, has good hardware support, and will be up to date and very secure from viruses and malware.

  2. mkstallings1, it bothers me when people say that this particular Linux distribution (or Linux itself) is secure from viruses (or malware).

    The fact is that I don’t know of any OS that is secure from viruses, unless they have a bullet-proof scanner built in.

    The better phrasing would be “not a target for viruses.” The virus and malware makers target particular OS’s because of the number of people/ease of infecting the system. That’s why most are aimed at Windows OS. More are starting to target Macs now that Mac is getting a respectable toe-hold. I’m sure that in a few years time, they’ll be aiming at Linux.

    We shouldn’t get lazy and think that Linux is secure from them, so that when they do come after Linux, we’ll be prepared.


Leave a reply:

Before commenting please:

  • Read the article.
  • Comment on the article.
  • No personal information.
  • No spam.

Comments violating those rules will be removed. Comments that don't add value will be removed, including off-topic or content-free comments, or comments that look even a little bit like spam. All comments containing links and certain keywords will be moderated before publication.

I want comments to be valuable for everyone, including those who come later and take the time to read.