I get this message every time I start Spybot which follows:
āSpybot-Search&Destroy has detected that you have the following
product installed. This may cause incompatibilities; for more
information click Yes to visit our websiteā, etc. And then lists:
LavaSoft AdAware which I do have installed on my computer. Should I
remove one the these two programs or keep them both and live with the
message?
Iāve never seen this message, but its presence doesnāt surprise
me.
Spybot and AdAware are two programs that do the same thing: theyāre
anti-spyware scanners.
And while it might be easy to think that this is simply one program
calling out its competitor, itās much more likely that thereās an
honest technical reason for the message.
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
In general itās a bad idea to run two real-time anti-virus or
anti-spyware products at the same time. To clarify that a little:
-
You should run both an anti-virus program and an
anti-spyware program. -
Both of those may have āreal timeā scanning components, and thatās
ok. -
You should not have two anti-virus programs running real-time
components simultaneously; they are likely to conflict. -
You should not have two anti-spyware programs running real-time
components simultaneously; they are likely to conflict. -
You certainly can run as many different non-real time scans as you
like, as long as theyāre not run at the same time.
anti-virus or anti-spyware products at the same time.ā
So what do I mean by āreal timeā?
Real time scanning is software that runs in the background and scans
for malware while you go about your daily tasks. It might examine your
downloads as youāre downloading them, or scan your email as it comes
in. It happens as you do it, in real time.
The alternative is a stand-alone or āstaticā scan. You initiate a
scan, it scans your system, reports anything it finds, and it exits.
Nothing is installed, nothing remains, it simply looks for problems and
then goes away.
The problem is that real time scanners need to āhook intoā the
system to perform their scans. And if more than one scanner attempts to
hook in for real time scans, they can conflict with each other.
My guess is that Spybot is noticing that AdAware is hooked in, and
warning you of the potential conflict.
There are a few approaches you can take.
You can, of course, simply choose one or the other. In all honesty,
this is my suggestion. Both are good products, and thereās rarely a
case where you really need both.
The alternative is to turn off any real time components in one of
the two. Exactly how thatās done depends on the product, but look for
terms like āresidentā, āreal timeā and the like. If Iām not mistaken, I
think Spybot has the oddly named ātea timerā as a real time component
as well.
That way, only one product will protect you while you use your
computer, and you then can use the other periodically āon demandā to
perform static scans of your system.
But good for you for using anti-spyware software. Youāre ahead of
many people in this regard.
I use both Ad-Aware and Spybot and have not seen this message before. Although, I have seen it prior to downloading other anti-virus apps. I agree with Leoās assessment that the key here is āreal-timeā. I use free version of both of these products and use them āon demandā. By doing so, it has yet to cause a conflict.
I believe the āerrorā message mentioned includes a prompt that will direct you to more information on http://www.safer-networking.org ā the page states that Ad-Aware may mistakenly identify some of Spybot Search and Destroyās files as malware.
I have have two real time spyware running with no problem or slow down, spyware terminator and windows defender and 1 on demand scanner
I have had this same āpop-upā screen; many times. I use different op systems and now a new hard drive and I know my utility programs. So while downloading updates I download my utility programs. Just make sure the asked program is not running and go ahead. Iāve been using both of the above mentioned programs for years and have no programs with them..separately. I consider it a non-issue and move on!!!!!
I too have used both utilities (free versions) and have seen the message that SBSD provides. Canāt recall, but there may have been a ādonāt show this message againā choice on the popup. I have had no problems with using both programs. Both are passive protection.
While it is not advisable to run 2 real-time anti-virus programs at the same time (they HAVE components that one can almost identify as a āvirusā, to ārecogniseā a virus), it is normally NOT a problem to run 2 or more anti-spyware real-time programs! NOTE: Spybot uses the āTea-timerā, which also acts as a āfirewallā against spyware. It is imperative, to disable this accessory from Spybot. And, along the lines of firewalls, if one uses a decent firewall, then you should also disable the WINDOWS Firewall! I personally use Jetico for my firewall, Avast! Anti-virus Professional, PC Tools Spyware Doctor AND SUPERAntiSpyware, in real-time configuration!
Also, you should check which version of Spybot you are using, as there was also a version out that had a number of bugs, and unless one is above the average user, NOT the ābetaā version!
Using 2 similar programs, although NOT in identical modes, is a good idea! One always āchecksā the other one!
Question similar what this person went through. I installed Spybot and did my best to delete/uninstall it. I think it messed up MY registry and iexplorer program (tools options locked, often canāt print and canāt hear some of flashplayer sound when I run moviesl) Its driving me crazyā¦Iāve tried all the usual remedies Iāve read about, but no good! Can you help?
Linda
I use both Ad Aware and Spybot, both are the free versions and each time I run Spybot I get the message about the program conflict and I ignore the message. as these are passive programs and only check for errors when you issue a scan command. I have found that in the past Spybot will find items Ad aware dose not find and Ad Aware finds items Spybot has missed.
I used to run both AdAaware and Spybot, both occasionally finding different items. However I had to get my local shop to reinstall Windows XP for me when I crashed in the summer and his recommendation was to use (only) Windows Defender for spyware. He put on Avast 4.8 but the reviews seem marginally to favou AVG 8.0
To expand on the comment that AC2 made:
The reason that Spybot recommends not using another antispyware is that spybot replaces some adware files with similar files without a payload aka ādummiesā. Letās say that a certain adware package is required to use another product on your computer that you still want to use. Spybot will replace the file that serves the ads and violates your privacy and replace it with another file that makes the product still think you are viewing ads, and so it still works. Essentially, uninstalling certain ad software will make the programs that rely on it not work, so Spybot tricks those programs. Hope that wasnāt too confusing.
Bearing all that in mind, another antispyware product might think the dummies are the original malware and try to remove them, rendering the programs relying on it inoperable. So, if you do run another program (I run several antispyware and antivirus one after the other) just remember which files Spybot replaced (look atthe logs).
I donāt like Spybot or Adaware anymore, they both have become very bloated apps and it seems all they catch are cookies. While I do use 2 antivirus apps (avira ā realtime, kaspersky ā non realtime), I feel my best protection is Acronis TrueImage. I have partitioned my c: drive to only 10 gigs (only 5 is used) used only for my os (xp sp3) and a d: drive for everything else. Itās easy to move your mydocs to d: and a simple registry hack to move your āProgram Filesā
to d:(google āmoving āprogram filesā to d:). So if anything at all happens to my os itās just a few minutes to reinstall my imaged c:. My surfing habits take me to many questionable sites and yet I sleep very well at night.
19-Oct-2008
While itās true that most warnings involve anti-malware programs which can actually interfere with each other, I have seen a rare occasion when other programs will detect the installation of a competitor and demand, no less, not simply warn, that the competitor must be removed. Since I know for a fact that the competitor is not running at the time, and will not interfere, I flatly refuse to comply. Or I simply wonāt use the one being installed. Basicallyā¦
Whichever one makes me choose,
Is the one that will lose.