I have 32 bit version of Widows XP running on cable connection. What is the
bare minimum a single user needs to protect himself from malware, viruses and
such? Right now I use Zone Alarm, AVG professional, Windows internet security
settings, ad aware, spaminator, Advance system care and IO Bit, Glary
Utilities. Some of these have passive features that run in the background, like
ad aware and IOBIT and maybe system care and who knows what else may be
running. I’ve been nailed by a trojan twice, and lost all each time. Then
sometimes when AVG finds something, says it is locked or archived and can’t do
anything. Anyway, back to original question. What would you use on your PC if
you were me for security that would cover all bases without the apps stepping
on each other’s toes making problems worse.
One of the common scenarios I see are folks that have many more internet
security tools and software running than they need. Way more.
And of course they wonder why their system is a slow as molasses.
I don’t know if you’re in that boat, but that does seem like a long list of things. Too long for my tastes.
It doesn’t have to be complex, but there are definitely a few things that
most people don’t realize or think of when it comes to internet security.
I won’t share what I would do; I’ll share what I
actually do. What you should do is very, very similar.
]]>
<
Leo has some good advice here.
Lets see…
I use the Windows firewall, along with Defender (free).
I use Avast! Antivirus Home edition (free).
This has realtime background ‘shields’, though I don’t know if it runs sceduled scans. I run scans myself regularly.
I use Seek & Destroy anti-spyware (free).
This also has realtime checking, and I manually scan and protect my system regularly.
I pay a visit to Trent Micro’s HouseCall (free) for an online scan if I’m feeling paranoid.
i use avast as my resident anti virus and zone alarm firewall.
Good advice on the Backup and Common Sense! I run a layered defense that I describe on my Free Computer Protection page that reinforces everything you say in this post. The program I would recommend everyone use is WinPatrol. It’s light on system resources and has some nice features for both security and controlling startup programs.
I use sandboxie when I surf internet.I surf outside sandboxie when I know it is safe like your site.
Automatic updates?
No, NO! Turn them OFF!
But DO be sure to visit the Microsoft Update page, religiously, about ten days after (you’ll see why in a moment) every Patch Tuesday, and click Custom (NOT Express!) so that you can see precisely what updates you are getting.
Be sure to subscribe to “Windows Secrets”, which gives you the low-down on which updates are problematical, and should be skipped. (This is why I said earlier to wait ten days after Patch Tuesday — “Windows Secrets” needs this time to examine the various patches and/or to receive complaints or reviews about them from subscribers). Not all patches are useful to you, and some may actually be harmful (How about that! Microsoft, the very maker of your computer’s operating system, distributing a harmful patch! Who woulda thunk it!?). I’ve “hidden” more than one update in my day; believe me, you’ll end up doing the same.
The person who enables Automatic Updates and simply takes absolutely “EVERYTHING” as it comes is, in my opinion, begging for trouble.
Automatic Updates is for simpletons who are too stupid to know how to use a computer.
If that shoe fits, you’re more than welcome to wear it — please, enable Automatic Updates and good luck to you.
Otherwise, turn them OFF, and go the Manual route. 🙂
I understand the position you’re taking – and for most somewhat technically astute people it does in fact make sense. Even I have automatic updates set to download but not install so I can review the updates before they’re applied.
But I believe that this is expecting too much of the average user. Evaluating whether a specific update is safe or not just isn’t something that I think makes sense to ask people to do so – even with the help of Windows Secrets. The only viable alternatives for the average user are no updates at all (a non-starter for many, many reasons), or to take all automatic updates automatically.
The good news is that the number of times that an automatic update has affected large numbers of people is actually very small.
25-Jun-2010
Great advise. Although not mentioned in this article, there are a completely different host of potential problems that are possible if connected to the internet in a free hot-spot such as a coffee house or hotel. This is something I am trying to figure out now myself, but I do not believe the above completely protects you in this situation.
Respectfully,parts of the advice might be a tad out of date.
Microsoft Defender has been replaced by Microsoft Security Essentials which is a free antivirus/anti spy suite and is ‘live’ therefore other programs should not be run live as well or conflicts and speed issues will occur.
Win Patrol{Google} is an excellent adjunct to MSSE which does not conflict.Win Patrol just reports & asks is it OK when other software tries to make critical alterations to your system.A free version is available.
Jp
Useful post. Thank you.
I use and recommend Avira AV and Handy Backup, they are easy and reliable security solutions, and works great…
http://www.handybackup.net
http://www.avira.com
I thought your comments about back up being the most important item was thought provoking for me. Even though checking/having security etc, I got a wopper of bots/virus/trojans and nothing would resolve it and had to reformat it was so deep/bad! My question about back up is when I clicked on a link (from India I believe) it when I got in trouble. PC was completely taken over more each day; I would like to know if my backup contains that link, am I at a loss for the last years links I saved? Is there anyway to print out a >list
Can you please email with your thoughts.
Thanks for the advice Leo, it’s great to have you provide this kind of information. I imagine there are plenty of people out there who simply do not have the time or the interest to visit a website once a week and spend more time deciding which updates they need or don’t need to install. I think most people that I know just want something that works and I believe your approach is probably as good as it gets for the majority. I’m sure there are plenty more technically minded people like Glenn P. out there that could follow a different approach – but then I question why they need to be looking at your post in the first place when they are clearly not your audience!
Regarding “back-ups”. I need some help. Though careful surfer, I had a complete take over of my PC after downloading a link in India. It was so bad; reformatted. I think in my backup copies (I don’t know *how far back*) lurks the link that was trouble; I >THINKopening
There is no “minimum” amount of internet security. The more the better. Especially when it comes to spyware which seems to be more of an issue than viruses nowadays.
There are plenty of good free antispyware programs you can download and install.
http://www.onlinecomputertips.com/spyware/
09-Sep-2010
I emphatically agree with Leo’s last response, which is why I don’t use any, other than AdAware and Spybot S&D both of which I use only infrequently and they never find much. But I do use Opera, which is less of a target for malware even than Firefox, and I block most adware and delete all cookies on exiting the browser.
The best piece of advice Leo gave is to use common sense, aka caution. All the malware in the world won’t offer complete security, because there’s always the timelag from a vulnerability being discovered until the anti-malware software is updated.