For a home user with no special programs and no gaming, am I better off with a single core processor or a dual core processor? I play no games. I simply have a few usual things (word processor, registry cleaners, anti-spy and security stuff, etc.) but I need a new PC. This one is over 10 years old. It is SLOW even after cleaning the registry, defragging, optimizing, and everything else. Would I be better off with a dual core or a single core processor?
Normally, I stay away from specific processor recommendations because things change so much, and so often, and I’m just not one of those people that wants to do a detailed comparison between processor A and processor B. There are plenty of other passionate people who’ll happily do that all day long.
In this, however, I do have an opinion: more cores may be better, but too many may not be worth it.
I was looking at some ads for various computers and noticed some confusing CPU info. For example:
Acer desktop with i5-650 @ 3.2GHz
SYX Gamer desktop with i7-950 @ 3.06GHz
Sony Vaio laptop with i7-740QM @ 1.73GHz
I always thought an i7 was better than an i5, which was better than an i3. Based on the above, is the Acer CPU better (as in more powerful, efficient, and faster) than either of the i7s? And why would one i7 (the SYX) be about 75% faster and more powerful than the Sony i7?
To call it confusing only scratches the surface of the processor nomenclature and configuration. In my opinion, it’s more complex than mere mortals can comprehend.
Sadly, I am but a mere mortal.
However, I will share my priorities, which the average consumer may share when selecting a computer. In so doing, I’m sure I’ll annoy some of the geekier members of my audience.
I’ll also look at a few more things about the processor configuration mix, and compare the three processors you list.