Googlejacking? What’s “Googlejacking”?
One of the both exciting and frustrating things about this industry is the
rate at which new terminology appears. “Googlejacking” just showed up recently
and refers to a technique to use someone else’s content to appear as it if was
on your site. The apparent intent is to achieve higher overall Google ranking
for your own site and content, or to otherwise get more traffic.
Unfortunately, Googlejacking is also a side effect of a very valid technique
many sites use to manage external links and to track visitors leaving their
sites.
Sites like Ask Leo!
Yes, I am an inadvertent googlejacker.
Become a Patron of Ask Leo! and go ad-free!
First we need to define something called “redirection”. Redirection is a
technique where a web server can respond to a request for one URL by saying, in
effect, “oh, you really want that URL over there”. It’s a technique used by the
URL shortening services like http://clicktrustats.com or http://tinyurl.com.
Using these services you can define a that a short URL, say:
actually take you to a different URL, like:
http://ask-leo.com/how_do_i_keep_my_computer_safe_on_the_internet.html
The short version being more convenient for email and less prone to
wrapping.
This kind of service operates by redirecting the shorter URL to the
longer one.
I use the same technique on Ask Leo!, but
for a different reason. I have my own redirector and most any link that takes
you away from Ask Leo! is run through the
redirector. For example:
will redirect to:
I do this for several reasons:
-
The redirection is logged. That means when someone clicks on http://ask-leo.com/d-ms, it shows up in my web server logs.
This allows me to measure what external links people are clicking on when they
visit my site. -
The redirection can be changed. While it’s unlikely in this example, if I
ever wanted http://ask-leo.com/d-ms to go
to some other location, it’s a single, simple change for me, and everywhere
I’ve used that link will now go to the new location without my having had to
change them all. -
It’s shorter. When writing a web page that’s not as much of an issue, but
like the tinyurl example above, it’s still more convenient to write a shorter
URL.
OK, so redirection is handy for a few reasons. Where does Googlejacking come
in?
Googlejacking
A few months ago, if you looked for “LSASS” on Google, you would get the
following hit on the first page of results:
Microsoft
Security Bulletin MS04-011: Security Update for …
… Vulnerability Details. LSASS Vulnerability – CAN-2003-0533: A … system.
Mitigating Factors for LSASS Vulnerability – CAN-2003-0533: …
http://ask-leo.com/d-40508a – 101k – Feb 10, 2005
–
Examine that carefully.
The link, http://ask-leo.com/d-40508a, is a link I use in the article
What are “LSASS”, “LSASS.EXE” and “Sasser” and how do I know if I’m infected?
What do I do if I am? to link people to a Microsoft Security Bulletin which
resides on the Microsoft site. If you click on that link, that’s where you end
up: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-011, on the Microsoft web site.
Google had decided that my redirection link (http://ask-leo.com/d-40508a) was the way to get to
Microsoft’s web page (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS04-011.mspx).
That’s Googlejacking. Getting your link to someone else’s content
to rank higher than the content’s own URL.
My case is accidental, based on legitimate scenarios. But Googlejacking can
also be used for nefarious reasons as well. For example a company could seek to
Googlejack their competition’s web pages in the hopes of reducing the
competitions Google rankings and as a result, scoring higher themselves.
As a website owner or programmer who’s using redirections, it’s theorized
that you can avoid inadvertent Googlejacking by using a 301 (Moved Permanently)
instead of a 302 (Moved Temporarily) redirect. 302 seems to be the default in
many cases, so if you’ve done nothing then you could be an inadvertent
Googlejacker :-).
As a website owner who’s being Googlejacked, you actually have very little
recourse. You can try to contact the offending site or Google itself, but it’s
unclear what success you may have. The good news is that Google’s continually
improving their algorithms. For example, my example above no longer works –
Microsoft’s own page ranks highly, and my redirection link is nowhere to be
found.
Can someone tell me how do I know if godaddy.com uses 301, 302 or 200 for redirects?
How can I tell?
Thanks,
Fran
I use a tool called “Curl” (http://curl.haxx.se) – unfortunately it’s fairly techie to get the right version and set up, but once you have it you can do something like this (in a command shell):
curl -I http://ask-leo.com/d-ms
which returns what’s called the “header” information. In that case it’ll show that that URL is a 301 redirect to http://microsoft.com.
It could also be used for even more nefarious purposes. A scripted page that checks the UserAgent can send bots to genuine content while everyone else
gets sent to a page with malicious content. For example: A googlejacked link for Katrina victims would show up on google as if it was the real deal because for any crawling bot
it would be, but everyone else would be sent to MaliciousSite.blah
After my site http://www.smallshoes.org was Google Jacked I set up a site trying to get an idea of how many sites have been Google Jacked at http://www.googlejacking.org since I have not been able to find any stats on this.
R. Joe
Leo – I am very sorry I entered the wrong address for the site which was google jacked above. So it does not appear that I am trying to “stuff” your blog I will just say the offended site was a .net not a .org. I did forget to add that until my site was google jacked I had a #2 rank on the specific search terms for my niche site (which I built for my wife).
R. Joe